Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 8;9:635764. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.635764

TABLE 2.

Summary of studies using artificial intelligence in IBD diagnosis.

References Published year Aim of study Type of AI Number of subjects Outcomes
Maeda et al., 2019 2019 Prediction of persistent histologic inflammation associated with UC SVM Training set: 12,900 images from 87 patients. Test set: 9935 images from 100 patients Sensitivity: 74%, specificity: 97%, accuracy: 91%
Mahapatra et al., 2016 2016 Segmentation of CD from abdominal MRI Active learning framework combined with semi-supervised learning 70 patients (fivefold cross validation) Dice Metric: 92.4%, Hausdorff distance: 7.0 mm
Hubenthal et al., 2015 2015 Diagnostics of IBD SVM 114 patients AUROC: 0.75–1.00
Mossotto et al., 2017 2017 Classification of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease SVM 239 patients Accuracy: 82.7% (model utilizing combined endoscopic/histological data achieved the best performance)
Douglas et al., 2018 2018 Classification of disease state and treatment outcome in pediatric Crohn’s disease RF Intestinal biopsies of 20 treatment-naïve CD and 20 control pediatric patients Accuracy: 84.2% (model utilizing 16S taxonomic datasets achieved the best performance)

IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; SVM, support vector machine; CD, Crohn’s disease; MRI, magnetic resonance images; AUROC, area under receiver operating characteristic; RF, random forest.