Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 22;203(16):e00230-21. doi: 10.1128/JB.00230-21

TABLE 1.

Effect of vancomycin exposure on cytoplasmic PG intermediates in VSEfm and VREfm and comparison with MRSA (28)

Concn (time zero concn) forb:
VSEfm
VREfm
MRSA
Intermediatea −Vm +Vm (1.5 h) −Vm +Vm (1.5 h) +Vm (18 h) −Vm +Vm (1.5 h)
UDP-linked intermediates (μM)
    UDP-NAG 940 (20) 290 (20) 590 (40) 510 (30) 470 (30) 740 (60) 77 (10)
    UDP-NAM 1,130 (60) 740 (50) 480 (20) 740 (20) 320 (30) 1,250 (60) 5,200 (900)
    UDP-Mono 113 (2) 7.2 (0.5) 80 (10) 63 (4) 35 (1) 81 (7) 2,900 (500)
    UDP-Di 55 (6) 4.3 (1.5) 95 (8) 24 (2) 47.8 (0.4) 32 (6) 110 (50)
    UDP-Tri 30 (5) 97 (7) 48 (7) 43 (1) 26 (4) 10 (2) 35 (8)
    UDP-Penta 590 (20) 2,280 (120) 356 (8) 900 (40) 190 (90) 260 (30) 62,000 (2,000)
    UDP-Pentadepsi ND ND 13.4 (0.4) 730 (10) 290 (50) ND ND
    UDP-Tetra ND ND 15.6 (0.4) 774 (6) 44 (5) ND ND
    UDP-Penta-d-iAsp ND ND ND ND 1.3 (0.2) ND ND
    UDP-Pentadepsi-d-iAsp ND ND 13.2 (0.9) 46 (2) 27 (2) ND ND
    UDP-Tetra-d-iAsp ND ND ND ND 2.1 (0.1) ND ND
    UDP-Sum 2,860 (60) 3,500 (200) 1,470 (130) 3,820 (30) 1,460 (60) 2,380 (90) 71,000 (1,900)
Amino acid and d-Ala–d-Ala intermediates (mM)
    l-Ala 52 (8) 17.4 (0.6) 29 (2) 20.1 (0.8) 15.2 (0.9) 67 (7) 64 (7)
    d-Ala 26 (3) 5.2 (0.2) 22 (2) 12 (3) 11 (1) 48 (8) 46 (16)
    d-Ala–d-Ala 2.8 (0.4) 0.3 (0.1) 0.71 (0.05) 0.4 (0.1) 0.12 (0.07) 0.9 (0.3) 17 (2)
    d-Ala–d-Lac ND ND 0.11 (0.01) 2.8 (0.1) 2.1 (0.3) ND ND
    l-Glu 126 (9) 24.2 (0.6) 81 (3) 95 (2) 57 (9) 250 (30) 210 (30)
    d-Glu 10.7 (0.2) 4.7 (0.7) 17.6 (0.3) 51 (9) 49 (2) 200 (40) 230 (50)
    l-Lys 11.1 (1.2) 4.1 (0.4) 11.8 (0.5) 21 (1) 12.6 (0.6) 64 (5) 79 (3)
    l-Asp 38 (4) 9.3 (0.2) 18.3 (0.4) 21 (2) 22 (3) 96 (11) 15 (8)
    d-Asp 22 (3) 5 (1) 14 (1) 25.1 (0.5) 15.7 (0.2) 63 (9) 15 (4)
a

UDP-Mono, UDP-NAM–l-Ala; UDP-Di, UDP-NAM–l-Ala–d-Glu.

b

Values are mean ± SE (n = 3), Vm, vancomycin. UDP-NAG-enolpyruvate levels were not detectable (<0.5 μM). ND, not detectable.