Table 5.

Synthesis of phrases provided in the SWOT analysis of six different evaluation tools used in eight country-based case studies.

	ISSEP (CA and UK)	ECoSur (VN and DK)	ATLASS (DK)	PMP-AMR (BE, DK, IT, and NO)	NEOH (DK, BE, IT NO, and NL)	SURVTOOLS (DK and NL)
Like	Provision of a conceptual model for integrated surveillance of AMU and AMR surveillance	Comprehensive evaluation of collaboration Participatory evaluation Provision of a clear guidance	Automated analysesProgress monitoringEasy to communicate results	Easy progress monitoring Participatory evaluation Evaluation of the implementation levels	Comprehensive and multi-faceted OH assessment Evaluation of implementation quality	Objectivity Comprehensive framework for different evaluation aspects
Difficulty	No provision of guidance to collect and analyze of data	Evaluation of collaboration only	Why need for such detailed data?	Subjectivity Crude scoring method	Cumbersome	Requirement of training for conducting evaluation Time-consuming for evaluation of complex aspects
Be aware of	Necessary combination with other tools depending on the evaluation question	Characterization and evaluation of integration regarding collaborative objectives and context	Not possible to measure minor progress of epidemiological performance	Complexity in terms of people to include Self-assessment tool Results not comparable across countries	Requirement of training for application Resource demanding	Provision of an evaluation plan only, not AMU and AMR specific
Not covering	Guidance for conducting evaluation	Surveillance performance	Environment and plant sector specifically	One Health assessment Distinction between ongoing and incomplete activities Evaluation of quality of activities	Progress monitoring Surveillance performance	Laboratory aspects One Health assessment