Table 6.
Results of scoring of six tools for AMR surveillance evaluation according to eight themes describing the scope of the evaluation tool (the number of times the tool was assessed is given in the bracket).
| ISSEP (2) | ECoSur (2) | ATLASS (1) | PMP-AMR (4) | NEOH (5) | SURVTOOLS (2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMU and AMR specific | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Collaboration | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Resources | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Output and use of information | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Integration | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Governance* | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Adaptivity | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Technical operations | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Crude summary score | 25 | 25 | 28 | 24 | 23 | 17 |
*
Governance was included in this study by 9 of the 20 of the assessors (however, not a separate theme on the https://guidance.fp7-risksur.eu/welcome/decision-support/). The scoring scale used was 1 = not covered (red), 2 = not well-covered (orange), 3 = more or less covered (yellow), and 4 = well-covered (green).