Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 30;30(8):2349–2362. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02823-3

Table 3.

Test–retest reliability and construct validity

Concordance of items between test and retest (n = 133) Standardized factor loadings
Weighted kappa (95% CI) Interpretationa Model 1 Model 2b
Factor 1 Factor 2
1.1 Reduction strength arms 0.794 (0.658–0.840) Substantial 0.695 0.725
1.2 Reduction strength legs 0.735 (0.637–0.834) Substantial 0.897 0.930
1.3 Reduction muscle mass 0.682 (0.590–0.773) Substantial 0.806 0.827
1.4 Reduction physical capacity 0.613 (0.495–0.732) Substantial 0.917 0.951
1.5 Reduction length of walks 0.750 (0.673–0.828) Substantial 0.867 0.873
2.1 Difficulty moderate effort 0.691 (0.541–0.842) Substantial 0.901 0.915
2.2 Tired moderate effort 0.646 (0.485–0.808) Substantial 0.856 0.864
3.1 Get up from floor 0.683 (0.512–0.854) Substantial 0.786 0.802
3.2 Carrying heavy objects 0.546 (0.335–0.756) Moderate 0.821 0.833
4 Tired when walking 0.798 (0.732–0.865) Substantial 0.874 0.866
5 Feel weak 0.791 (0.709–0.873) Substantial 0.877 0.900
6 Balance problems 0.867 (0.812–0.921) Almost perfect 0.673 0.689
7 Limit movements 0.728 (0.637–0.819) Substantial 0.850 0.868
8 Leisure activities 0.406 (0.185–0.627) Moderate 0.594 0.605

aKappas interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where ≥ 0.8 is almost-perfect agreement, ≥ 0.6 and < 0.8 is substantial agreement, ≥ 0.4 and < 0.6 is moderate agreement, ≥ 0.2 and < 0.4 is fair agreement, and < 0.2 is slight agreement

bModel 2 is a 2-factor model with correlated residual variance between items 1.5 and 4