Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;20(4):1383–1397. doi: 10.1007/s10237-021-01450-8

Table 11.

Summary of model comparison patient variation ranges

Models compared PWS (%) PWSn (%) Max-FSS (%) Min-FSS (%) Ave-FSS (%)
2D models with/without circumferential shrink (M1 vs. M2) 9.79–29.65 3.87–13.40 N/A N/A N/A
3D FSI models with/without cyclic bending (M3 vs. M4) 7.16–14.88 9.48–19.24 0.46–6.29 N/A N/A
3D FSI models with/without cyclic bending at locations with max curvature change (M3 vs. M4) 15.07–49.52 7.48–34.05 1.52–12.95 N/A N/A
2D model vs. 3D TL model (M1 vs. M3) 18.72–59.54 24.04–46.07 N/A N/A N/A
3D TL model vs. 3D FSI model (M3 vs. M5) 14.12–42.24 11.08–41.90 N/A N/A N/A
3D structure-only model versus 3D FSI model (M3 vs. M6) 0.29–8.27 0.22–3.17 N/A N/A N/A
3D fluid-only model versus 3D FSI model (M3 vs. M7), maximum pressure N/A N/A 0.56–9.52 3.59–36.63 4.87–6.25
3D fluid-only model versus 3D FSI model (M3 vs. M7), minimum pressure condition N/A N/A 0.19–7.54 2.83–23.80 0.38–2.85
3D fluid-only model versus 3D FSI model (M3 vs. M7), Average over a cardiac cycle N/A N/A 0.62–7.94 1.13–30.15 2.33–3.29

Numbers given below are percentages of model solution differences unless otherwise indicated. N/A: not applicable