Table 6.

Content analysis of comments of users.

	(A) Historic		(B) Pandemic
	2009 to March 10, 2020		March 11 to August 31, 2020	Statistics
	n (E:W:M) (%)		n (E:W:M) (%)	P
Participants	33 (4:26:3) (100)		57 (0: 44:13) (100)
Grief	13 (0:11:2) (39.4)		5 (0:3:2) (8.8)	***
Personal loss	8 (0:6.2) (24.2)		1 (0:0:1) (1.8)
Loss of a friend	2 (0:2:0) (6.0)		1 (0:0:1) (1.8)
Loss at the school	3 (0:3:0) (9.0)		0
Societal loss	0		2 (0:2:0) (3.5)
Disenfranchised grief	0		1 (0:0:1) (1.8)
Expressivity (use of emoji or emoticons)
In grief	0		0
Not in grief	0		11 (0:7:4) (21)	**
Expressivity (number of words)	n, Mean ± SEM		n, Mean ± SEM
In grief	13, 37.5 ± 7.0		5, 17.0 ± 5.44	(*)
Not in grief	20, 9.8 ± 2.3	GGG	52, 16.1 ± 2.03	(*)

Data for content analysis of comments of users on the viral children's story are expressed as real numbers (n); ratio of E, entities; W, women; M, men; and percentages (%). In bold, the highest percentages are indicated. The symbol “—” is meant for absence or data not reported or quantifiable, according to YouTube analytics. Statistics: Student t test of Fisher exact test; p < 0.001 vs. the comments not referring to grief;

^*p < 0.05, one-tailed;

^**p < 0.01;

^***p < 0.001 vs. the historic.