Table 4.
Perception of usability and motivation among survivors of an acute myocardial infarction who completed a 12-week telerehabilitation program.
| Items | Participants endorsing (n=18), n (%) | |||
|
|
Disagree or strongly disagree | Don’t know or neutral | Agree or strongly agree | |
| System usability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would use frequentlya | 0 (0) | 2 (12) | 15 (88) |
|
|
Found unnecessarily complexb | 14 (88) | 0 (0) | 2 (13) |
|
|
Easy to usea | 3 (18) | 0 (0) | 14 (82) |
|
|
Need technical supporta | 12 (71) | 2 (12) | 3 (18) |
|
|
Functions well integrateda | 4 (24) | 1 (6) | 12 (71) |
|
|
Too much inconsistencya | 8 (47) | 0 (0) | 9 (53) |
|
|
People can learn to use quicklya | 2 (12) | 1 (6) | 14 (82) |
|
|
System awkward to usea | 14 (82) | 0 (0) | 3 (18) |
|
|
Self-confidence using systema | 1 (6) | 2 (12) | 14 (82) |
|
|
Need to learn a lot prior to useb | 13 (81) | 1 (6) | 2 (13) |
| Motivation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The system motivates me to walk and exercisea | 1 (6) | 2 (12) | 14 (82) |
|
|
The system helps me to follow the walking and exercise recommendationa | 1 (6) | 2 (12) | 14 (82) |
|
|
Thanks to the system I walk and exercise more than beforea | 5 (29) | 6 (35) | 6 (35) |
aMissing responses (n=1) were not included in the denominator of percentage calculations.
bMissing responses (n=2) were not included in the denominator of percentage calculations.