TABLE 3.

MFVD values, MFVD₁ value and classification of some cotton varieties during 2016∼ 2018.

Varieties	2016		2016		2017		2017		2018		2018
	MFVD	Group	MFVD1	Group	MFVD	Group	MFVD1	Group	MFVD	Group	MFVD1	Group
10599	0.43	III	0.52	II	0.53	III	0.52	III	0.35	III	0.42	III
108 Fu	0.70	II	0.70	II	0.57	III	0.66	II	0.51	II	0.60	II
2 Hao	0.38	IV	0.36	III	0.49	III	0.53	III	0.41	III	0.41	III
5917-N10-1	0.64	II	0.61	II	0.63	II	0.73	II	0.58	I	0.64	II
Xin lu Zao45	0.73	I	0.75	I	0.73	I	0.70	II	0.53	II	0.59	II
CQJ-5	0.64	II	0.54	II	0.66	II	0.68	II	0.63	I	0.66	II
KK1543	0.81	I	0.86	I	0.68	II	0.67	II	0.51	II	0.51	III
MSCO-12	0.76	I	0.84	I	0.71	I	0.88	I	0.51	II	0.61	II
ND359-5	0.77	I	0.78	I	0.68	II	0.89	I	0.58	I	0.56	II
TM-1	0.77	I	0.71	II	0.65	II	0.77	I	0.51	II	0.62	II
Bellsno	0.63	II	0.58	II	0.82	I	0.89	I	0.55	II	0.59	II
Xin hai 20	0.46	III	0.42	III	0.39	IV	0.32	IV	0.42	III	0.47	III
Shi yuan 321	0.57	III	0.53	II	0.61	II	0.68	II	0.50	II	0.63	II
Tai yuan 112	0.74	I	0.71	II	0.65	II	0.73	II	0.51	II	0.49	III
Tiao he 2013	0.72	II	0.64	II	0.76	I	0.85	I	0.67	I	0.75	I
Tian yun 10	0.64	II	0.56	II	0.61	II	0.66	II	0.56	II	0.53	III
Xi bu 50	0.56	III	0.48	II	0.44	IV	0.39	IV	0.46	III	0.48	III
Kui 85-174	0.49	III	0.34	III	0.46	IV	0.52	III	0.39	III	0.42	III
Xin lu zao 26	0.46	III	0.41	III	0.41	IV	0.40	IV	0.47	III	0.50	III
Xin lu zao 38	0.70	II	0.68	II	0.67	II	0.73	II	0.52	II	0.58	II
Xin lu zao 3	0.45	III	0.42	III	0.61	II	0.56	III	0.39	III	0.37	III
Xin pao 1 hao	0.46	III	0.42	III	0.66	II	0.68	II	0.44	III	0.47	III
Xin shi K7	0.48	III	0.19	IV	0.50	III	0.53	III	0.35	III	0.39	III
Xin lu Zao 13	0.73	I	0.82	I	0.79	I	0.87	I	0.65	I	0.64	II
Xin lu Zao 19	0.61	II	0.50	II	0.70	I	0.78	I	0.48	II	0.58	II
Xin lu Zao 32	0.44	III	0.35	III	0.43	IV	0.53	III	0.44	III	0.53	III
Xin lu Zao 7	0.59	II	0.56	II	0.73	I	0.75	II	0.49	II	0.62	II
Zhong R 2067	0.47	III	0.36	III	0.55	III	0.54	III	0.46	III	0.55	II
Zhong R 2016	0.75	I	0.59	II	0.64	II	0.68	II	0.44	III	0.46	III
Zhong R 773	0.60	II	0.58	II	0.68	II	0.69	II	0.57	II	0.63	II