Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 28;11(7):1921. doi: 10.3390/ani11071921

Table 4.

Perceptions toward animal welfare of student from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC) and Universidad de Chile (UChile).

Total
(n = 1000)
PUC
(n = 500)
UChile
(n = 500)
p-Value
Importance of animal welfare in productive system, n (%) 974 (97.4) 486 (97.2) 488 (97.6) 0.843 1
Quality of life in production of:
Cow’s milk
Good, n (%) 255 (25.5) 128 (25.6) 127 (25.4) 1.000 1
Poor, n (%) 211 (21.1) 87 (17.4) 124 (24.8) 0.005 1
Beef
Good, n (%) 223 (22.3) 108 (21.6) 115 (23.0) 0.649 1
Poor, n (%) 206 (20.6) 110 (22.0) 96 (19.2) 0.309 1
Salmon
Good, n (%) 37 (3.7) 23 (4.6) 14 (2.8) 0.180 1
Poor, n (%) 254 (25.4) 123 (24.6) 131 (26.2) 0.611 1
Pig
Good, n (%) 271 (27.1) 133 (26.6) 138 (27.6) 0.776 1
Poor, n (%) 89 (8.9) 53 (10.6) 36 (7.2) 0.076 1
Laying hens
Good, n (%) 214 (21.4) 108 (21.6) 106 (21.2) 0.939 1
Poor, n (%) 240 (24.0) 127 (25.4) 113 (22.6) 0.336 1
Most important operations in animal production 0.438 1
Food, n (%) 206 (20.6) 100 (20.0) 106 (21.2)
Transportation, n (%) 28 (2.8) 17 (3.4) 11 (2.2)
Slaughter, n (%) 69 (6.9) 38 (7.6) 31 (6.2)
Rearing, n (%) 472 (47.2) 226 (45.2) 246 (49.2)
Accommodation, n (%) 225 (22.5) 119 (23.8) 106 (21.2)
Food products made while taking into account animal welfare compared to products that do not take this into account 0.354 1
Better flavour, n (%) 543 (54.3) 281 (56.2) 262 (52.4)
Same flavour, n (%) 186 (18.6) 85 (17.0) 101 (20.2)
I don’t know, n (%) 271 (27.1) 134 (26.8) 137 (27.4)
Food products made while taking into account animal welfare compared to products that do not take this into account 0.916 1
Higher nutritional quality, n (%) 601 (60.1) 303 (60.6) 298 (59.6)
Same nutritional quality, n (%) 187 (18.7) 91 (18.2) 96 (19.2)
I don’t know, n (%) 212 (21.2) 106 (21.2) 106 (21.2)

1 Chi-square test for independence.