Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;11(7):1964. doi: 10.3390/ani11071964

Table 6.

Carcass characteristics of Angus steers receiving different implant strategies.

Implant Treatments 1 p Values of Contrasts 2
CON E2 TBA ETBA SEM E2 vs. CON TBA vs. CON ETBA vs. CON
Steers (n) 13 11 12 11
Dressing Percentage 60.1 59.3 60.4 60.2 0.46 0.21 0.61 0.86
Hot Carcass Weight (kg) 317 311 330 343 7.41 0.57 0.16 0.008
Marbling Score 3 486 468 483 423 36 0.71 0.94 0.16
Ribeye Area (cm2) 70.71 72.65 78.06 74.06 2.13 0.51 0.006 0.22
12th Rib Fat Thickness (mm) 7.67 7.65 7.49 7.85 0.23 0.91 0.41 0.59
Cold Camera Yield Grade 2.99 2.91 2.65 3.08 0.16 0.67 0.06 0.67

1 Implant treatments administered on day 0 include: no implant (CON), Compudose (E2; 25.7 mg estradiol), Finaplix-H (TBA; 200 mg trenbolone acetate), and Revalor-S (ETBA; 120 mg trenbolone acetate + 24 mg estradiol). 2 Contrast statements were formed to test differences between E2, TBA, and ETBA vs. CON treatment. 3 300 to 399 = slight, 400 to 499 = small, 500 to 599 = modest.