Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1981 Mar 1;22(1):118–128. doi: 10.1186/BF03547213

Dustbathing Behaviour of Uropygial Gland Extirpated Domestic Hens

Effects of Dust Deprivation

Støvbadningsadfærd hos uropygialkirtel-extirperede tamhøner. Effekt af støvdeprivation

G Nørgaard-Nielsen 1,2,, K Vestergaard 1,2
PMCID: PMC8300517  PMID: 7258023

Abstract

Dustbathing behaviour of uropygial gland extirpated and intact White Leghorn hens was studied after 27 and 75 h of deprivation of dust. Thereafter the hens were given access to dust (litter) and latency and duration of their first dustbathing bout were recorded. A short latency and/or a long duration were taken to indicate a strong urge to perform dustbathing. Judged by either of these criteria the gland extirpated birds showed a higher dustbathing tendency than the intact birds and in both groups the dustbathing tendency increased from 27 to 75 h of deprivation. Because of these findings the present study failed to support the “lipid regulation theory”: that the amount of lipid in the plumage should regulate the dustbathing tendency. Rank in the social hierarchy significantly influenced latency and duration of dustbathing but there was no simple correlation. After two weeks with constant access to litter no differences in the amount of feather lipids could be found between gland-extirpated and intact birds.

Keywords: dustbathing, uropygial-gland-extirpation, dust deprivation, domestic hens

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

References

  1. Benson B. N., Schein M. W. Factors influencing dustbathing in Coturnix quail. Amer. Zool. Abstr. 1965;5:196. doi: 10.1093/icb/5.2.196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black A. J., Hughes B. O. Patterns of comfort behaviour and activity in domestic fowls: A comparison between cages and pens. Brit. vet. J. 1974;130:23–33. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)35987-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolliger A., Varga D. Gholestanol in avian plumage. Aust. J. exp. Biol. 1960;38:265–270. doi: 10.1038/icb.1960.28. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borchelt, P. L.: Dustbathing in Bobwhite Quail (Colinus virginianus) : A Regulatory Model. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University 1972.
  5. Borchelt P. L. The organization of dustbathing components in Bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) Behaviour. 1975;53:3–4. doi: 10.1163/156853975X00209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borchelt P. L., Duncan L. Dustbathing and feather lipid in Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) Condor. 1974;76:471–477. doi: 10.2307/1365824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borchelt P. L., Eyer J., McHenry D. S., Jr. Dustbathing in Bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) as a function of dust deprivation. Behav. Biol. 1973;8:109–114. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6773(73)80011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown N. S. The effect of louse infestation, wet feathers, and relative humidity on the grooming behavior of the domestic chicken. Poultry Sci. 1974;53:1717–1719. doi: 10.3382/ps.0531717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Folch J., Lees M., Stanley H. S. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957;226:497–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Healy W. M., Thomas J. W. Effects of dusting on plumage of Japanese quail. Wilson Bull. 1973;85:442–448. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ishida K., Suzuki T., Kusuhara S., Yamaguchi M. Influence of preen gland removal on the lipid over the plumage of roosters. Poult. Sci. 1973;52:83–87. doi: 10.3382/ps.0520083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kruijt, J. P.: Ontogeny of social behaviour in Burmese Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour 1964, Suppl. 12, 1–201.
  13. Levine R. L., Hunter J. E., Borchelt P. L. Dustbathing as a regulatory mechanism. Bull. math. Biol. 1974;36:545–553. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8240(74)80049-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin G. Üeber Verhaltenstõrungen von Legehennen im Käfig. Ein Beitrag zur Klärung des Problems tierschutzgerechte Hühnerhaltung. (On behavioural disturbances of laying hens in cages. A contribution to the clarification of animal protection problems in poultry-faming). Angew. Ornithol. 1975;4:145–176. [Google Scholar]
  15. Siegel, S.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo 1956.
  16. Simmons, K. E. L.: Feather maintenance. In Thompson, A. L. (ed.) : A New Dictionary of Birds. McGraw-Hill, New York 1964, pp. 278–286.
  17. Vestergaard, K.: Dustbathing in the domestic fowl — Diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1981a, 7 (in press).
  18. Vestergaard, K.: Behavioural and physiological studies of hens on wire floors and in deep litter pens. In (Ed. Fölsch, D.W.) Das Verhalten von Legehennen. (The behaviour of laying hens). Tierhaltung 1981b, 12 (in press).
  19. Williams N. S., Strungis J. C. The development of grooming behavior in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Poultry Sci. 1977;58:469–472. doi: 10.3382/ps.0580469. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES