Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 1;60(Suppl 1):S30–S41. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1825839

Table 4.

Participant’s feedback on m2Hear.

Statement Strongly Disagree or Disagree n (%) Neither Disagree or Disagree n (%) Strongly Agree or Agree n (%)
The videos aided my understanding of the topics 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 49 (98%)
I liked that the videos were short in duration 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 49 (98%)
I found m2Hear difficult to use 48 (96%) 0 (0%) 2 (4%)
It was important to me to be able to select which videos to view 0 (0%) 3 (6%) 47 (94%)
If a problem with my hearing or hearing aid arose, I would refer back to m2Hear 2 (4%) 2 (4%) 46 (92%)
The videos were pitched at the right level 2 (4%) 2 (4%) 46 (92%)
I liked that the order of the topics fitted around when I might need to use them (e.g. change batteries first, communicate with others later) 5 (10%) 0 (0%) 45 (90%)
I used m2Hear because it might make me hear and communicate better (4%) 4 (8%) 44 (88%)
The videos held my interest 7 (14%) 0 (0%) 43 (86%)
If I had a question about hearing aids I was able to find the answers easily 3 (6%) 5 (10%) 42 (84%)
m2Hear has given me more confidence to use my hearing aids and communicate with others 1 (2%) 7 (14%) 4 (84%)
m2Hear did not provide me with any additional information to the advice given to me by my audiologist 41 (82%) 4 (8%) 5 (10%)
I felt motivated to use m2Hear 3 (6%) 8 (16%) 39 (78%)
The quizzes and activities gave me clear messages in understanding what is right and what is wrong 2 (4%) 11 (22%) 36 (74%)
I would prefer written information than use m2Hear 35 (70%) 11 (22%) 4 (8%)
The quizzes and activities were valuable in showing me what I had learned 1 (2%) 15 (31%) 33 (67%)
Now that I have used m2Hear I am more likely to contact audiology if I have a problem 8 (16%) 11 (22%) 31 (62%)
It was important to me that m2Hear could be tailored to my needs and preferences 5 (10%) 15 (31%) 29 (59%)