Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Bull. 2020 Oct 29;147(2):134–168. doi: 10.1037/bul0000307

Table 6.

Univariate Pairwise Comparisons of Math Assessment Subgroups

Subscale beta 95% CI
k
LL UL
High stakes tests vs. Standardized research assessments −.005 −.06 .05 378
High stakes tests vs. Nonstandardized research assessments and Other tests −.05 −.12 .01 222
High stakes tests vs. Course grade −.02 −.08 .04 169
High stakes tests vs. Exam grade .06 −.002 .13 146
Standardized research assessments vs. Nonstandardized research assessments and Other tests .01 −.03 .05 488
Standardized research assessments vs. Course grade .01 −.03 .05 435
Standardized research assessments vs. Exam grade .08** .03 .14 412
Nonstandardized research assessments and Other tests vs. Course grade .02 −.05 .08 279
Nonstandardized research assessments and Other tests vs. Exam grade .09* .02 .15 256
Course grade vs. Exam grade .06* .003 .11 203

Note.

p < .05*

p < .01**

predictor variables no longer significant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction; CI = Confidence Interval; LL = Lower Level; UL = Upper Level; k = number of effect sizes.