| Implementation process |
Prior to submission |
Did you consult the MREC prior to submission about the procedure? |
|
Publicity procedure |
Did you know about a FTRP and if so, was it clear to you? |
|
Documents |
Which documents were required for review? |
|
Submission quality |
How was the quality of your submission and research proposal compared to regular research? |
|
Administrative aspects |
Were administrative aspects handled differently? |
| Review timelines |
Speed |
What is your opinion about the length of the review timelines and were these different compared to regular review? |
| Review experiences |
Review quality |
Did you experience differences in (quality of) the review? |
|
Satisfaction |
How satisfied were you with the review compared to regular review? |
|
Points of improvement |
How can the procedure be improved? |
