Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):1017. doi: 10.3390/biom11071017

Table 2.

Comparison between groups I, II, III.

I II III
N = 119 mean SD Min max N = 164 mean SD min max N = 7 mean SD min max ANOVA F I vs II I vs III II vs III
ERY 0.04 0.34 −0.80 1.20 ERY −0.04 0.33 −1.08 1.20 ERY −0.11 0.24 −0.40 0.30 1.88
HC 0.00 0.03 −0.07 0.16 HC −0.01 0.03 −0.08 0,14 HC −0.01 0.02 −0.03 0.03 2.43
MCH 0.00 0.09 −0.30 0.50 MCH 0.03 0.10 −0.30 0.40 MCH 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.19
MCV −0.35 3.95 −11.00 20.00 MCV −0.63 4.02 −13.00 17.00 MCV −0.13 1.21 −13.00 17.00 3.35 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05
MCHC 0.16 0.70 −1.70 1.60 MCHC 0.47 0.62 −0.90 2.20 MCHC 0.19 0.42 −0.70 0.50 7.77 p < 0.001 p > 0.05 p > 0.05
Vitamin D −17.05 19.19 −122.70 −0.10 Vitamin D 18.46 19.84 0.10 118.50 Vitamin D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116.10 p < 0.001 p > 0.05 p < 0.05

ERY, number of erythrocytes; HC, hematocrit; max, maximum, min, minimum; SD, standard deviation; MCHC, ratio between mean corpuscular haemoglobin and the mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, MCV, mean corpuscular volume; I, 119 patients with a fall of vitamin D; II 164 patients with a rise of vitamin D; III, 7 patients with no change of vitamin D.