TABLE 4.
Results.
| (1) LPM | (2) Probit | |
| High-trust dummy | 0.249*** (0.034) | 0.248*** (0.032) |
| Gender of the vignette | −0.003 (0.023) | −0.002 (0.023) |
| Male | −0.010 (0.030) | −0.013 (0.030) |
| Working | 0.029 (0.033) | 0.026 (0.034) |
| Age | −0.001 (0.001) | −0.001 (0.001) |
| Medium-income group | −0.081** (0.030) | −0.080*** (0.027) |
| High-income group | −0.060 (0.042) | −0.056 (0.041) |
| Bachelor’s degree | −0.034 (0.038) | −0.033 (0.040) |
| Master’s degree | −0.020 (0.026) | −0.013 (0.030) |
| Constant | 0.719*** (0.053) | |
| F statistics or Wald-χ2 | 774.506 | 56,474.465 |
| R2 or pseudo R2 | 0.089 | 0.095 |
| Number of observations | 948 | 948 |
Results from OLS (clustered standard errors in parentheses) and probit (clustered standard errors in parentheses) models. For the probit model marginal effects are reported. Significance levels: *p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.