Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan 24;84:101980. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101980

Table 7.

Mixed-Effects Subgroup Analyses of Dichotomous Moderators

Description k B SE 95%CI 95%CI Z p-value Between Study Heterogeneity


LL UL Q df p-value I2
Intervention Type

 Biofeedback 19 −0.631 0.168 −0.961 −0.301 −3.749 <.001 87.823 18 <.001 79.504
 Non-Biofeedback 20 −0.489 0.123 −0.731 −0.247 −3.966 <.001 57.088 19 <.001 66.718
  Combined between- group effects 0.462 1 0.497
 Biofeedback (Inactive control comparisons only) 13 −0.974 0.232 −1.428 −0.520 −4.205 <.001 59.068 12 <.001 79.684
 Non-Biofeedback (Inactive control comparisons only) 12 −0.476 0.120 −0.711 −0.240 −3.969 <.001 23.823 11 0.013 53.826
  Combined between- group effects 3.648 1 0.056

 Control Type3

 Active 25 −0.279 .132 −0.537 −0.021 −2.118 .034 55.595 19 <.001 66.047

 Inactive 20 −0.709 .127 −0.958 −0.460 −5.586 <.001 85.433 24 <.001 71.908
  Combined between-group effects 5.526 1 0.019

Note. k = Number of Studies, SE=Standard Error, CI=Confidence Interval, LL=Lower Limit, UL=Upper Limit

1

Number of studies listed in dichotomous analyses of control type is greater than analyzed sample of k=39, due to the following studies containing both active and inactive conditions: Colgan et al., 2016; Enright et al., 2004; Gruzelier et al., 2014; Lin, 2018; Wahbeh et al., 2016; Yekta et al., 2017