Table 2.
Comparison of joinpoint model with and without alcohol policies with Likelihood ratio test of significance (two-tailed, p value), by age group.
| Age groups | Joinpoint with policies | Joinpoint without policies | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIC | R2-adjusted | AIC | R2-adjusted | ||
| 20+ | 1255.932 | 0.854 | 1268.47 | 0.837 | p = .0003 |
| 20–29 | 868.94 | .76 | 874.78 | .75 | p = .0073 |
| 30–39 | 1029.55 | .68 | 1033.64 | .67 | p = .018 |
| 40–49 | 1203.73 | .80 | 1204.53 | .80 | p = .091 |
| 50–59 | 1412.38 | .87 | 1417.80 | .87 | p = .0090 |
| 60–69 | 1607.69 | .80 | 1613.06 | .80 | p = .0092 |
| 70–79 | 1919.41 | .76 | 1936.84 | .74 | p < .0001 |
| 80+ | 2490.16 | .69 | 2531.68 | .68 | p = .0001 |
Lower AIC indicates a better model fit.