Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 25;35(8):2110–2118. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01503-3

Table 1.

AI-based structure-function in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

Author/Ref. Title Disease Technique Prediction Outcome measure Outcome
Rohm et al. [27] Predicting visual acuity by using machine learning in patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration Neovascular age-related macular degeneration

• Five different machine-learning algorithms

• Best performance by Lasso regression

• logMAR visual acuity after 3- and 12 months

• Mean Absolute Error (MAE)

• Root Mean Sqaured Error (RMSE)

• 3 Months = MAE: 0.11–014/RMSE: 0.18–0.2

• 12 Months = MAE: 0.16–0.2/RMSE: 0.2–0.22

Schmidt-Erfurth et al. [28] Machine learning to analyze the prognostic value of current imaging biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration Neovascular age-related macular degeneration • Random forest • BCVA at Baseline and 3 months follow-up • Accuracy (R2)

R2 = 0.21 baseline

R2 = 0.70 3 months

Gerenda et al. [29] Computational image analysis for prognosis determination in DME Diabetic macular edema • Random forest • BCVA at Baseline and 1-year follow-up • Accuracy (R2)

R2 = 0.21 baseline

R2 = 0.23 1 year

Aslam et al. [30] Use of a neural net to model the impact of optical coherence tomography abnormalities on vision in age-related macular degeneration Neovascular age-related macular degeneration • Scaled conjugate gradient backpropagation (supervised learning) • BCVA • Root Mean Sqaured Error (RMSE) • 8.21 Letters
Pfau et al. [31] Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: guideline for physicians for the critical evaluation of studies Neovascular age-related macular degeneration • Nested cross validation • BCVA (LogMAR) • MAE • 0.142
Müller et al. [23] Prediction of function in ABCA4-related retinopathy using ensemble machine learning ABCA4-related Retinopathy

• Ensemble machine learning algorithms

• Three models

 (a) Retinal layer

 (b) All structural data

 (c) demographic data

• BCVA

• Divided into four categories from no to severe impairment

• Area under the curve (ROC)

(a) 88.64–92.25%

(b) 90.23–93.68%

(c) 87.26–91.44%

Sumaroka et al. [45] Foveal therapy in blue cone monochromacy: predictions of visual potential from artificial intelligence Blue Cone Monochromacy

• Random forest

 (a) Layer thickness

 (b) Reflectivity

• BCVA • Root mean squared error (RMSE)

(a) 0.159

(b) 0.167