Table 1.

Results of MAOVAs.

	Type of Job Insecurity Threat
	Person-at-Risk			Job-at-Risk
	M	SD	n	M	SD	n	Wilks’ Lambda	F	df	Adjusted p *
Anticipated Well-Being							0.82	6.97	4, 129	<0.001
Negative Affect	2.98	0.91	55	2.46	0.91	81		12.83	1, 132	<0.001
Organization Based Self-Esteem	2.89	1.04	55	3.70	0.93	80		21.67	1, 132	<0.001
CWB-O 1	1.71	0.86	55	1.43	0.54	81		2.49	1, 132	0.021
CWB-I 2	1.48	0.81	54	1.29	0.62	81		1.69	1, 132	0.047
Anticipated Social Exchange							0.82	5.71	5, 128	<0.001
Social Exchange—Supervisor	2.93	1.08	54	3.69	0.69	81		24.63	1, 132	<0.001
Social Exchange—Organization	2.79	1.06	54	3.38	0.86	81		11.89	1, 132	0.001
Turnover intention	329	0.96	55	3.25	1.00	80		0.14	1, 132	0.708
OCB-I 3	3.27	0.91	55	3.72	0.77	81		9.53	1, 132	0.002
OCB-O 4	3.83	0.95	55	4.00	0.64	81		1.42	1, 132	0.235
Anticipated Job Preservation							0.86	3.49	6, 128	0.003
Work Effort	3.91	1.15	55	4.16	0.84	81		2.31	1, 133	0.131
IM Supplication	2.13	1.13	55	1.64	0.85	80		8.36	1, 133	0.004
IM Self Promotion	3.10	1.00	55	3.03	0.94	80		0.19	1, 133	0.661
IM Ingratiation	3.10	1.01	55	3.13	0.94	80		0.03	1, 133	0.858
IM Exemplification	3.33	0.93	55	3.02	0.91	80		3.8	1, 133	0.053
IM Intimidation	1.90	1.01	55	1.71	0.80	80		1.48	1, 133	0.226

* p-values are adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction; ¹ Organizational counterproductive work behavior; ² Interpersonal counterproductive work behavior; ³ Interpersonal organizational citizenship behavior; ⁴ Organizational citizenship behavior. The bold in the table shows a distinction between the overall results and post-hoc results.