Table 3.

Quality assessment of the included qualitative studies.

	Antoine et al., 2013	Skerrett, 1998	Picard et al., 2005	Keesing et al., 2016	Chung et al., 2012	Canzona et al.,2019	Dorval et al., 2005	Morgan et al., 2005	Cömez et al., 2016
Clear statement of, and rationale for, research question/aims/purposes	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Study thoroughly contextualized by existing literature	+/−	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Method/design apparent, and consistent with research intent	+	+	+	+	+	+/−	+	+	+/−
Data collection strategy apparent and appropriate	+	+	+/−	+/−	+	−	+	+	+
Sample and sampling method appropriate	+/−	+	−	+	+	+	+	+	+
Analyticapproach appropriate	−	+	−	+	+	+	+/−	+	+
Context described and taken account of in interpretation	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Clear audit trailgiven	+	+/−	+	+	+	+	+	+/−	+
Data used to support interpretation	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Researcherreflexivitydemonstrated	−	−	−	+	+/−	−	−	−	−
Demonstration of sensitivity to ethical concerns	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Relevance and transferabilityevident	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Total Score	8	8.5	7.5	10.5	10.5	8.5	9.5	9.5	8.5