Table 2.
Site | N | Ar | P(%) | Pa | Ho | He | FIS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozopol | 29 | 1.6 | 80 | 521 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.077 |
Kindvig | 5 | 1.5 | 50 | 0 | 0.19 | 0.20 | −0.065 |
Karrebaeksminde | 13 | 1.5 | 62 | 0 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.021 |
Guldborgsund | 32 | 1.5 | 68 | 2 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.019 |
Travemünde | 31 | 1.6 | 74 | 7 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.020 |
Mariehamn | 26 | 1.4 | 49 | 1 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.038 |
Turku | 27 | 1.5 | 68 | 9 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.031 |
Raahe | 22 | 1.5 | 62 | 0 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.041 |
Elbe | 29 | 1.5 | 68 | 182 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.018 |
Rhine | 32 | 1.4 | 66 | 56 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.015 |
Danube | 18 | 1.3 | 44 | 4 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.018 |
N = sample size, Ar = allelic richness, P(%) = percent polymorphic sites, Pa = private alleles, Ho = observed heterozygosity, He = unbiased expected heterozygosity, FIS = inbreeding coefficient.