Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 17;13(14):3583. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143583

Table 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of simple algorithm and ANN. OSCC: Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, HGD: High Grade Dysplasia, LGD: Low Grade Dysplasia, TP: True positive, TN: True negative, FN: False negative, FP: False positive.

Method Diagnosis Sensitivity (TP/(TP + FN)) Specificity (TN/(TN + FP)) PPV NPV
Algorithm-Score OSCC Vs Dysplasia/Benign/Normal 93(51/55) 74(87/117) 63 96
Dysplasia VsBenign/Normal 95(91/96) 76(16/21) 95 76
DensNet-201-SVM OSCC Vs Dysplasia/Benign/Normal 86(43/50) 81(179/221) 51 96
Dysplasia Vs Benign/Normal 84(81/97) 82(101/124) 78 86
Inception-ResNet-v2-SVM HGD Vs LGD/Benign/Normal 83(63/75) 69(100/146) 58 89