Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;13(14):3563. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143563

Table 2.

Univariable analysis of PET/CT imaging parameters showing statistical significance and clinical factors for predicting overall survival.

Variables p-Value Hazard Ratio
(95% Confidence Interval)
C-Index
Age (≤65 years vs. >65 years) 0.020 2.26 (1.14–4.48) 0.632
Sex (women vs. men) 0.346 0.73 (0.38–1.41) 0.574
Clinical TNM stage Stage I–II vs. stage III 0.025 2.41 (1.12–5.20)
Stage I–II vs. stage IV <0.001 5.07 (2.18–11.78) 0.690
Serum CEA (≤5.00 ng/mL vs. >5.00 ng/mL) 0.002 2.93 (1.49–5.74) 0.663
CA19-9 (≤103.0 U/mL vs. >103.0 U/mL) 0.021 2.28 (1.13–4.59) 0.632
NLR (≤4.17 vs. >4.17) 0.047 2.03 (1.01–4.10) 0.642
PLR (≤217.54 vs. >217.54) 0.068 1.85 (0.96–3.57) 0.625
Treatment (surgery vs. others treatments) 0.048 1.91 (1.02–3.70) 0.602
BM imaging parameters BM SUV (≤1.53 vs. >1.53) 0.002 4.47 (1.73–11.51) 0.678
BLR (≤0.79 vs. >0.79) 0.003 4.76 (1.68–13.54) 0.658
Conventional PET/CT parameters Peak SUV (≤6.65 vs. >6.65) 0.048 2.90 (1.01–6.53) 0.622
MTV (≤15.60 cm3 vs. >15.60 cm3) 0.021 2.18 (1.12–4.21) 0.619
TLG (≤41.40 g vs. >41.40 g) 0.002 3.80 (1.65–8.72) 0.655
First-order textural parameter Entropy (≤3.40 vs. >3.40) 0.002 2.87 (1.47–5.61) 0.650
Higher-order textural parameters GLCM energy (≤0.012 vs. >0.012) 0.011 0.43 (0.22–0.82) 0.648
GLCM entropy (≤6.45 vs. >6.45) 0.027 2.10 (1.09–4.05) 0.640
GLZLM zone length nonuniformity (≤22.03 vs. >22.03) 0.035 2.03 (1.05–3.91) 0.640

BM, bone marrow; BLR, bone marrow-to-liver uptake ratio; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; C-index, Harrell’s concordance index; GLCM, grey-level co-occurrence matrix; GLZLM, grey-level zone length matrix; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SUV, standardized uptake value; TLG, total lesion glycolysis.