Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 24;225:153565. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153565

Table 7.

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR/Cas-based tests in detecting different molecular targets of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.

Virus type Molecular targets Sensitivity (SN) Specificity (SP) References
MERS-CoV N, E, S, M, ORF 1ab, RdRp No data 100% (no cross-reactivity with other pathogens like SARS-CoV-2) [145], [146], [147], [148], [149]
SARS-CoV-2 N 95% concordance to qRT-PCR results 100% [150]
N LOD: few RNA copies/sample 100% [146]
S LOD: 10 RNA copies/reaction(96.23% compared to RT-RPA) 100% [151]
RdRp LOD: 1 × 104 RNA copies/mL 100% [145]
N, E LOD: ~25 RNA copies/μL (93.1%) 98.5% [152]
N, E LOD: ~80 RNA copies/sample <100% (minor cross-reactivity with other pathogens) [155]
N, ORF 1ab LOD: 6.75 RNA copies/μL 100% [325]
N, ORF 1ab LOD: 1–10 RNA copies/reaction (100% consistent result with qRT-PCR) 100% [149]
N, ORF 1ab LOD: 7.5–25 RNA copies/μL 100% [326]
E, ORF 1ab LOD: 4 RNA copies/μL (100% -ve predictive agreement, 97.14% +ve predictive agreement) 100% [154]
N, S, M LOD: 0.1 RNA copies/μL 100% [153]
Unclear LOD: ~100 RNA copies/mL 100% [147]