Table 11.
Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA in detecting different targets of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.
Virus type | Targets/Sources of samples | Sensitivity (SN) | Specificity (SP) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
MERS-CoV | S | ~100% | Varied due to cross-reactivity with other pathogens in sera of different patients (<100%) | [192] |
S | LOD: 0.04–5.9 ng/mL of S protein | Unclear (no significant intra-/inter-assay variability) | [328] | |
S | 92.3% (IgG) | 100% (IgG) | [201] | |
S | ~97% at day 21 and above (IgG) | Unclear | [190] | |
N, S | varied from ~20–100%; | varied from 0% to 100% (depending on dilution factors) | [200] | |
SARS-CoV-2 | N | LOD: 9.00 ng/μL | High (Unclear on the numerical value) | [329] |
N | 94.9% (IgG) | 97.1% (IgG) | [202] | |
N | 90.3% (IgG) | 97.9% (IgG) | [203] | |
S | 88.9–92.9% (IgG) | High (unclear on the values) | [199] | |
S | 64.1 (IgG), 74.3% (IgA) | 95.2 (IgG), IgA (84.2%) | [207] | |
S | 95% (IgG) | 97.8% (IgG) | [205] | |
S | 65 (IgG/A) | 96% (IgG/A) | [206] | |
S | 95.6–100% (IgG) | 86.7–100% (IgG) | [204] | |
S (RBD), inactivated virus | 53.3–92.1% (IgG) | ~99% | [209] | |
S (RBD) | 92% (IgA), 96% (IgG), 98% (IgM) | 99.3% | [208] | |
N, S | LOD: 5 pg/μL | 100% | [214] | |
N, S | 88–100% (depending on Ig types) | 96.4–100% (depending on Ig types) | [230], [330] | |
N, S | 58.8–96.2% (IgG) | ~95% (IgG) | [196] | |
N, S | 56.3–81.6% (IgG) | 99% | [216] | |
N, S | 74.3–82.2% (IgG), 77.1–80.4% (IgM) | 100% (IgG/M) | [213] | |
N, S | 84.2% (IgG) | 100% (IgG) | [212] | |
N, S | 93.1–98.3% (IgG/total antibody) | 86.3–96.4% (IgG/total antibody) | [211] | |
N, S | 35.5–61.3% (IgG/M); | Unclear | [183] | |
N, S | 86.4–87.9% (IgG) | 75.7–98.6% (IgG) | [215] | |
N, S, total antibody | 92.7–99.1% (IgG/total antibody) | 98.9–99.9% (IgG/total antibody) | [210] | |
Sera (unclear target) | 45% (IgG) | 97% (IgG) | [184] | |
Sera (unclear target) | 69–80.6% (IgA), 48.8–72.9% (IgM), 79.8–83.7% (IgG); | 97.6–100% (IgA), 88.1–97.6% (IgM), 97.6–100% (IgG) | [182] |