Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 17;26(14):4338. doi: 10.3390/molecules26144338

Table 5.

Antimicrobial activity of EtOAc, hydroethanolic, and n-BuOH leaf extracts of A. arboreum against bacterial, fungal, and yeast strains by the disc method.

Strains Inhibition Zones Diameter (mm) a
Antibiotic/Antifungal AcOEt Extract EtOH-Eau (70/30) Extract n-BuOH Extract
Gram (+) bacterial strains b
Micrococcus luteus LB141110 17 ± 0.3 16 ± 0.0 20 ± 0.8 19 ± 0.3
Listeria ivanovii BUG 496 22 ± 0.3 17 ± 0.3 11 ± 0.3 16 ± 0.8
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 27 ± 0.8 20 ± 0.3 20 ± 0.8 20 ± 0.3
Gram (−) bacterial strains b
Salmonella enterica CIP 8039 10 ± 0.3 20 ± 0.3 14 ± 0.3 15 ± 0.3
Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 22 ± 0.3 16 ± 0.3 13 ± 0.3 16 ± 0.3
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027 11 ± 0.8 20 ± 0.3 18 ± 0.3 16 ± 0.3
Fungal strains c
Aspergillus niger GCA_003615085 NAd NA NA NA
Fusarium oxysporum CBS 513.88 20 ± 0.3 21 ± 0.8 22 ± 0.3 20 ± 0.3
Yeast strain c
Candida albicans ATCC 90028 19 ± 0.3 20 ±0.3 20 ± 0.3 18 ± 0.2

Values are the mean of three experiments ± standard deviation (SD). (a) Diameter of the inhibition zones of extract, including the diameter of a well of 6 mm. (b) Ampicillin was used as a standard antibiotic at a concentration of 10 µg/well. (c) Amphotericin B was used as a standard fungicide and antiyeast at a concentration of 20 µg/well. (d) No activity.