Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;10(7):1552. doi: 10.3390/foods10071552

Table 3.

Protein and dry matter content of 30 native oat grains, and the chemical composition of non-heated and heated oat flours as average and range values.

Component Sample Type Average Range
NIT dry matter (%) Grain 88.5 86.9–90.8
Dry matter (%) Non-heated flour 89.7 87.0–92.3
Dry matter (%) Heated oat flour 89.0 87.6–91.0
NIT Protein (dm, %) Grain 12.6 a 9.1–15.8
Protein (dm, %) Non-heated flour 15.6 b 11.4–20.5
Protein (dm, %) Heated oat flour 15.3 b 10.6–19.2
Starch (dm, %) Non-heated flour 60.6 x 46.6–75.3
Starch (dm, %) Heated oat flour 63.4 y 57.8–71.9
Lipid (dm, %) Non-heated flour 7.7 x 6.0–9.6
Lipid (dm, %) Heated oat flour 7.3 x 5.4–9.4
SAFA (% of FA) Non-heated flour 18.1 x 16.3–19.6
SAFA (% of FA) Heated oat flour 18.1 x 16.1–19.7
MUFA (% of FA) Non-heated flour 37.2 x 32.6–42.4
MUFA (% of FA) Heated oat flour 37.1 x 33.0–42.2
PUFA (% of FA) Non-heated flour 40.9 x 36.6–46.2
PUFA (% of FA) Heated oat flour 40.4 x 36.5–43.9
Total dietary fibre (dm, %) Heated oat flour 11.2 8.5–13.2
β-glucan (dm, %) Non-heated flour 5.2 y 3.6–6.7
β-glucan (dm, %) Heated oat flour 4.0 x 2.9–4.6
Ash (dm, %) Non-heated flour 2.2 x 1.7–2.6
Ash (dm, %) Heated oat flour 1.9 y 1.6–2.3

Different letters (a, b) within each column and parameter indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the samples based on Tukey’s HSD test. Different letters, x and y, within each column and component indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the samples based on independent sample t-tests. NIT, near infra-red transmittance; SAFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.