Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 20;10(7):1829. doi: 10.3390/cells10071829

Table 4.

The Bayes factors (BF01) for the three groups showing the strength of relationships between the six ROIs, BrainPAD and TMT-A. ROIs average values were corrected for age, education and total intracranial volume.

Locus Coeruleus Dorsal Raphe Median Raphe Ventral Tegmental Area Nucleus Basalis of Meynert Control Pontine ROI
HC (n = 395)
BrainPAD Pearson’s r −0.197 *** −0.292 *** −0.107 −0.074 −0.107 −0.109
BF10 142.324 22.466 0.608 0.185 0.599 0.643
TMT-A Pearson’s r −0.082 −0.158 −0.025 −0.045 0.085 −0.042
BF10 0.236 9.117 0.071 0.094 0.257 0.089
MCI (n = 156)
BrainPAD Pearson’s r −0.385 *** −0.321 *** −0.039 0.147 −0.318 *** 0.007
BF10 19303.214 399.634 0.113 0.523 339.646 0.101
TMT-A Pearson’s r −0.326 *** −0.219 0.001 0.019 0.029 0.007
BF10 517.357 4.219 0.100 0.103 0.107 0.101
AD (n = 135)
BrainPAD Pearson’s r −0.297 ** −0.249 −0.217 −0.305 −0.132 0.100
BF10 46.538 7.031 2.541 4.657 0.340 0.209
TMT-A Pearson’s r −0.384 *** −0.119 −0.041 −0.319 *** −0.315 *** −0.5224
BF10 3640.710 0.272 0.120 124.076 102.490 0.108

** BF10 > 30, *** BF10 > 100.