Table 3.

Summary of SSM-based, ASM-based and AAM-based methods.

Study	Year	Datasets	No. of Patients	Performance					Image Modalities	Time/ Equipment	Category
				Dice (%)	ASD (mm)	HD (mm)	95HD (mm)	VOE (%)
Abdolali [18]	2017	In-house	120	$91.38\pm 2.06$	$0.71\pm 0.09$	—	—	—	CBCT	5 min/CPU	SSM-based
Gollmer [37]	2012	In-house	30	—	$0.50\pm 0.00$	$11.30\pm 3.50$	—	$14.0\pm 1.9$	CT	—	SSM-based
Gollmer [38]	2013	In-house	30 + 6	—	$0.40\pm 0.08$	$10.26\pm 3.16$	—	$11.0\pm 2.0$	CT(train)/ CBCT(test)	—	SSM-based
Kainmueller [39]	2009	MICCAI 2009	18	$88.40$	—	$8.40$	—	—	CT	15 min/CPU	SSM-based
Lamecker [40]	2006	In-house	15	—	—	—	—	—	CT	—	ASM-based
Albrecht [41]	2015	PDDCA	40	$88.13\pm 5.55$	—	—	$2.83\pm 1.18$	—	CT	5 min/CPU	ASM-based
Kainmueller [42]	2009	In-house	106	—	$0.50\pm 0.10$	$6.20\pm 2.30$	—	—	CBCT	—	ASM-based
Mannion-Haworth [43]	2015	PDDCA	48	$92.67\pm 1.00$	—	—	$1.98\pm 0.59$	—	CT	30 min/CPU	AAM-based
Babalola [44]	2009	MICCAI 2009	18	$76.10\pm 5.10$ (exclude the 13th case)	—	—	—	—	CT	17 min/CPU	AAM-based