Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 8;18(14):7323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147323

Table 2.

Parental compliance among parents with various OHL, attitudes, perception of children’ oral hygiene status, and SES.

Variables Adherence to Follow-Ups Compliance with Investigators’ Advice
Yes No p-Value Yes No p-Value
Children’s oral hygiene status 0.038 N.S.
  Favorable 185 (73.7) 27 (58.7) 176 (74.3) 17 (68.0)
  Fair or poor 66 (26.3) 19 (41.3) 61 (25.7) 8 (32.0)
Negative attitude towards OHE 35 (13.8) 14 (26.4) 0.023 41 (17.0) 3 (12.0) N.S.
OHE material was not useful 62 (24.7) 6 (12.0) 0.05 48 (19.9) 12 (48.0) 0.001
OHL scores 29.99 (19.55) 18.68 (22.22) 0.015 29.15 (19.77) 36.14 (18.50) N.S.
Parents work full time 87 (34.4) 20 (37.7) N.S. 76 (31.5) 9 (36.0) N.S.
Monthly income over HKD 20,000 155 (61.3) 30 (56.6) N.S. 144 (59.8) 97 (40.2) N.S.
Father’s education level N.S. N.S.
  ≤9 years 56 (22.1) 5 (9.4) 53 (22.0) 5 (20.0)
  10 to 13 years 74 (29.2) 18 (34.0) 72 (29.9) 4 (16.0)
  ≥14 years 123 (48.6) 30 (56.6) 116 (48.1) 16 (64.0)
Mother’s education level N.S. N.S.
  ≤9 years 74 (29.2) 9 (17.0) 67 (27.8) 6 (24.0)
  10 to 13 years 81 (32.0) 19 (35.8) 79 (32.8) 6 (24.0)
  ≥14 years 98 (38.7) 25 (47.2) 95 (39.4) 13 (52.0)

HKD: Hong Kong Dollars; N.S.: No significance; OHL scores were presented in the format of mean (SD), and the other variables were presented in the format of n (%).