Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 22;13(7):2138. doi: 10.3390/nu13072138

Table 4.

Multiple regression analyses of the association between dietary vitamin D and metabolic syndrome and its parameters in class II/III obesity.

Variables Model 1
Vitamin D Dietary
p50 (<70.4 IU/Day)
Model 2
Vitamin D Dietary
p50 (<70.4 IU/Day)
Model 3
Vitamin D Dietary
p50 (<70.4 IU/Day)
PR CI 95% p * PR CI 95% p * PR CI 95% p *
Glycaemia
<100 mg/dL 1 1 1
≥100 mg/dL
or medicament
0.976 0.693–1.375 0.891 0.906 0.504–1.630 0.743 0.868 0.474–1.588 0.645
HDL–cholesterol lower
≥40 mg/dL or ≥50 mg/L 1 1 1
<40 mg/dL or <50 mg/L
or medicament
0.972 0.742–1.274 0.840 0.912 0.644–1.291 0.603 0.930 0.654–1.325 0.690
Triacylglycerol
<150 mg/dL 1 1 1
≥150 mg/dL
or medicament
1.032 0.735–1.451 0.854 1.219 0.736–2.019 0.440 1.2240 0.729–2.057 0.444
Abdominal circumference
<129.9 cm or 124.6 cm 1 1
≥129.9 or ≥124.6 m 0.969 0.863–1.088 0.596 1.020 0.879–1.184 0.792
Blood pressure
<130/85 mmHg 1 1 1
≥130/85 mmHg or medicament 1.043 0.821–1.324 0.729 0.830 0.566–1.218 0.342 0.825 0.558–1.222 0.338
Metabolic syndrome
No 1 1 1
yes 0.968 0.784–1.194 0.760 0.837 0.589–1.1882 0.319 0.797 0.564–1.125 0.196

* Poisson regression. PR (prevalence ratio). CI (confidence interval). Model 1: sex, age, schooling years, social class. Model 2: model 1 + smoking e binge drinking. Model 3: model 1 + model 2 + BMI.