Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 13;10(7):1429. doi: 10.3390/plants10071429

Table 3.

Mineral’s composition in some selected foliage leaves from the study site.

Sr. No. Fodder Species Na μg/g N % K % P% Zn (μg/g) Fe (μg/g) Cu (μg/g) Mn (μg/g) Ca (μg/g) Mg (μg/g) S (μg/g) Cr (μg/g)
1 Acer pictum Thunb. 45 1.06 1.87 0.12 58.71 322.38 64.67 87.08 77,105 17,792 1576 3
2 Acer caecium Wall. Ex D.Don 40 0.98 2.03 0.19 45.78 228.52 69.98 72.98 70,314 20,987 1498 3
3 Betula utilis D.Don 37 0.84 2.23 0.2 42.83 241.7 59.67 76.67 72,567 23,276 2187 3
4 Oxalis corniculata L. 20 0.67 1.87 0.21 18.03 161.71 34.32 56.55 67,347 17,865 2398 2
5 Euphorbia pilosa L. 23 0.71 1.56 0.3 28.89 179.08 40.43 52.78 64,675 25,897 1789 3
6 Heracleum lanatum Michx. 25 0.56 2.32 0.33 34.56 215.97 46.76 61.34 60,542 31,778 2198 6
7 Urtica dioica L. 17 0.77 1.54 0.21 45.87 194.65 41.98 46.54 32,987 29,832 2487 3
8 Berberis lycium Royle 21 0.81 2.15 0.2 49.34 189 58.87 54.87 39,876 20,651 2298 3
9 Quercus ilex L. 24 0.47 3.17 0.22 54.78 248.04 54.45 61.56 41,768 43,876 2587 5
10 Berberis asiatica Roxb. ex. DC 19 0.42 2.34 0.26 50.23 182.02 50.1 56.98 43,988 23,456 2476 3