Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;9(7):157. doi: 10.3390/toxics9070157

Table 3.

Advantages and disadvantages of extraction technique and analytical approaches used for determination of phthalates esters (PAEs) in environmental and food samples.

Extraction Technique Advantages Disadvantages
LLE
  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ High extraction efficiency

  • ✓ Simple operation

  • ✓ Suitable for small scale

  • ✓ Large volume of solvent

  • ✓ Low selectivity

  • ✓ Difficult to automate

  • ✓ Time-consuming

DLLME assisted (UVA-DLLME, VSLLME, VALLME, VS-EDLLME)
  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ High recovery

  • ✓ Low amount of sample

  • ✓ Low extraction time

  • ✓ Low volume of solvent

  • ✓ Low selectivity

  • ✓ Requires centrifugation

  • ✓ Requires the use of three solvents

Soxhlet
  • ✓ Simple operation

  • ✓ Suitable for small scale

  • ✓ Large volume of solvent

  • ✓ Limited extraction efficiency

  • ✓ Time-consuming

ASE
  • ✓ Easy of automatization

  • ✓ High efficiency

  • ✓ Low volume of solvent

  • ✓ Short extraction time

  • ✓ Requires high temperatures (40 to 200 °C) and pressures (1500 psi)

UAE
  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ Environmentally friendly

  • ✓ High extraction efficiency

  • ✓ Short extraction time

  • ✓ Thermally stable molecules

  • ✓ Decline of power with the time

  • ✓ Lack of uniformity in the distribution of ultrasound energy

Microwave assisted
  • ✓ Environmentally friendly

  • ✓ High recovery

  • ✓ Low volume of solvent

  • ✓ No clean-up

  • ✓ Reduced extraction time

  • ✓ Expensive

  • ✓ Low selectivity

  • ✓ Requires centrifugation/filtration

SPE
  • ✓ Alternative of LLE

  • ✓ Easy automation

  • ✓ Suitable for large scale

  • ✓ Involve many steps

  • ✓ Large volume of solvent

  • ✓ Possibility of low recoveries

MSPE
  • ✓ Environmentally friendly

  • ✓ Limited number of steps

  • ✓ Low amount of sorbent material

  • ✓ Reuse of sorbent material

  • ✓ Short extraction time

  • ✓ Requires vortex/shaker/magnetic stirrer

  • ✓ Selection of suitable sorbent

MSDP
  • ✓ Environmentally friendly

  • ✓ Limited number of steps

  • ✓ Quick

  • ✓ Simple

  • ✓ Requires anhydrous sorbents activated at high temperatures

SPME
  • ✓ Alternative to SPE

  • ✓ Limited number of steps

  • ✓ Low amount of samples

  • ✓ Reuse of the polymeric phase

  • ✓ Short extraction time

  • ✓ Potential contamination of the SPME needle

QuEChERS-dSPE
  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ Efficient clean-up by dSPE

  • ✓ Limited solvent consumption

  • ✓ Quick

  • ✓ Simple

  • ✓ Reduced precision and accuracy

  • ✓ Reduced sensitivity

Analytical platforms
GC FID
  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ High sensitivity

  • ✓ Quick

  • ✓ Wide linear range

  • ✓ No information related to structure

  • ✓ Time consuming

EI-MS
  • ✓ Volatiles

  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ High resolution

  • ✓ Information related to structure

  • ✓ Library database

  • ✓ Minimal matrix effect

  • ✓ User friendly

  • ✓ Hard ionization

  • ✓ Impossible analysis of thermally stable molecules

  • ✓ Low response factor consistency

  • ✓ Low-volatility compounds need to be derivatized

  • ✓ Moderate sensitivity

LC UV
  • ✓ Economical

  • ✓ High sensitivity;

  • ✓ HPLC columns can be reused without repacking or regeneration

  • ✓ Speed of analysis

  • ✓ User friendly

  • ✓ Sensitivity is chromophore dependent

  • ✓ Low specificity at short wavelengths

  • ✓ Identification based on retention time and UV/vis absorbance

ESI-MS
  • ✓ Derivatization is unnecessary

  • ✓ High sensitivity

  • ✓ Large mass range

  • ✓ Mid- to high chromatographic resolution;

  • ✓ Nonvolatile, polar, and ionic molecules (mid- to high-polarity)

  • ✓ Soft ionization

  • ✓ Speed of analyses

  • ✓ Thermally stable molecules

  • ✓ Expensive

  • ✓ Matrix effect

  • ✓ No universal Library

  • ✓ Limited potential in identification unless the MS/MS is used

  • ✓ De-salting may be required

  • ✓ A few restrictions on LC eluents

  • ✓ Low limit of detection (few pg to 10−15 g)

HRMS
  • ✓ High resolution

  • ✓ Mass accuracy

  • ✓ High selectivity

  • ✓ High specificity

  • ✓ Expensive

  • ✓ Instrument maintenance

  • ✓ Data file storage

Abbreviations: ASE: Accelerated solvent extraction; DLLME: dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; EI-MS: electron ionization mass spectrometry; ESI-MS: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; FID: flame ionization detection; GC: gas chromatograph; HRMS: high resolution mass spectrometry; LC: liquid chromatography; LLE: liquid-liquid extraction; MS/MS: tandem mass spectrometry; MSPD: matrix solid phase dispersion; MSPE: magnetic solid phase extraction; QuEChERS-dSPE: quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe: dispersive solid phase extraction; SPE: solid phase extraction; SPME: solid phase extraction; UAE: ultrasound assisted extraction; UV: ultraviolet detection; UVA-DLLME: ultrasound vortex assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction; VA-EDLLME: vortex assisted-emulsification dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; VSLLME: vortex-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction.