. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 25.

Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Sep 27;93(3):196–201. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052556

Table 2.

Significant correlates of differential sex frequency reporting between daily and recall reports

Covariate	Equal reporting in daily and recall	Higher report in daily^*		Higher report in recall^*

	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	AOR (95% CI)	Mean (SD)	AOR (95% CI)

Age^†	30.01 (11.08)	33.70 (11.96)	1.11 (0.98 to 1.25)	28.47 (10.74)	0.88 (0.79 to 0.99)
Female—n (%)	47 (12.91)	100 (27.47)	2.37 (1.34 to 4.20)	217 (59.62)	1.11 (0.69 to 1.81)
Male—n (%)	40 (15.15)	46 (17.42)	-	178 (67.42)	-
Lifetime sexual partnerst	20.57 (24.45)	31.87 36.53()	1.06 (1.01 to 1.12)	28.97 (38.24)	1.07 (1.01 to 1.13)

Model with equal reporting as the reference group.

^†

Adjusted OR and corresponding CI for 5 unit increase.

AOR: adjusted OR from generalised logit model.