Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;45(8):1844–1854. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00854-x

Table 1.

Comparison of model performances of PLS with sevenfold cross-validation between full metabolome vs post-selection.

Full metabolome Post-selection
nVar nComp R2Y Q2 PCV-ANOVA r nVar nComp R2Y Q2 PCV-ANOVA r
Pancreatic fat 910 1 0.39 0.25 2.43E–04 0.63 56 3 0.81 0.69 2.12E–12 0.90
Liver fat 910 1 0.52 0.33 6.86E–06 0.72 64 3 0.80 0.66 6.11E–12 0.89
VAT/SAT 910 1 0.47 0.30 1.32E–05 0.69 31 2 0.70 0.62 1.88E–12 0.83

nVar: number of variables; nComp: number of components; R2Y: goodness of model fit; Q2: predictivity; Pcv-anova: statistical significance of the PLS model; r: Pearson correlation coefficient.