Table 2.
Author and year | Assay | Materials evaluated | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Bidar et al. (2017)29 | TA: Light microscope evaluation Animal: 64 dog premolars TC: Direct |
MTA and PC | Chronic inflammation in WMTA, GMTA, white, and gray PC were 45.5, 27.3, 57.1, and 34.1%, respectively |
Leye et al. (2012)30 | TA: Mesurim Pro(®) software Human: 60 teeth TC: Indirect |
MTA and Dycal | MTA and Dycal success rate 3 months: 93 and 73% 6 months: 89.6 and 73% Dentine thickness increased in both materials with time |
Eskandarizadeh et al. (2011)31 | TA: Mesurim Pro(®) software Human: 90 intact first and second premolars of human maxillary and mandibular teeth TC: Indirect |
White MTA, Gray MTA, and Dycal | Calcified bridge of GMTA > Dycal at 30 and 60 days WMTA > Dycal at 90 days |
Shokouhinejad et al. (2012)32 | TA: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) instrument for elemental analysis Human: 60 horizontal root sections TC: Indirect |
BA, EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM), and white ProRoot Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) | MTA, BA, and ERRM showed increased precipitation with time |