Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;55(8):758–768. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa061

Table 3.

Generalized estimating equation results

Binge eating Craving
Perceived stress B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p
Intercept 1.53 0.07 1.40 1.66 522.55 <.001 0.82 0.05 0.72 0.93 244.70 <.001
Gender 0.09 0.07 −0.05 0.23 1.59 .208 0.06 0.06 −0.06 0.18 0.81 .367
Age <−0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 1.28 .258 −0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 7.06 .008
BMI 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 6.85 .009 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 5.22 .022
Perceived stress (between) 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 25.16 <.001 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 7.91 .005
Perceived stress (within) <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 <0.01 0.02 .895 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.41 .120
n = 109; observations = 1,617 n = 109; observations = 2,354
Reactivity B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p
Intercept 1.72 0.14 1.45 1.99 154.39 <.001 0.86 0.11 0.64 1.07 61.25 <.001
Gender −0.07 0.15 −0.36 0.22 0.21 .649 0.01 0.12 −0.23 0.25 0.01 .943
Age −0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 2.99 .084 −0.01 <0.01 −0.02 <0.01 7.37 .007
BMI 0.01 0.01 <−0.01 0.02 2.04 .153 0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.02 4.33 .037
Reactivity (between) <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 0.01 2.51 .113 <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 0.01 0.55 .456
Reactivity (within) <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 0.01 0.13 .717 <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 0.01 0.35 .552
n = 71; observations = 169 n = 79; observations = 226
Recovery B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 P B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p
Intercept 1.46 0.15 1.17 1.74 100.01 <.001 0.62 0.12 0.39 0.84 28.10 <.001
Gender 0.12 0.16 −0.18 0.43 0.63 .427 0.22 0.12 −0.02 0.47 3.21 .073
Age <−0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 0.61 .436 <−0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 1.49 .221
BMI 0.02 <0.01 0.01 0.03 16.58 <.001 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 5.73 .017
Recovery (between) <−0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 1.07 .302 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 4.31 .038
Recovery (within) <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 0.01 0.50 .481 <0.01 <0.01 <−0.01 <0.01 0.02 .886
n = 72; observations = 203 n = 84; observations = 321
Pileup B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p
Intercept 1.54 0.08 1.38 1.70 366.63 <.001 0.79 0.05 0.69 0.89 222.90 <.001
Gender 0.05 0.08 −0.12 0.22 0.34 .558 0.08 0.06 −0.04 0.20 1.61 .204
Pileup B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p B SE Lower CI Upper CI Wald χ 2 p
Age <−0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01 2.44 .118 −0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <−0.01 9.17 .002
BMI 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 6.47 .011 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 5.98 .014
Pileup (between) 0.13 0.04 0.06 0.20 13.01 <.001 0.13 0.03 0.06 0.19 14.50 <.001
Pileup (within) 0.06 0.01 0.04 0.08 29.26 <.001 −0.01 0.01 −0.03 0.01 1.09 .296
n = 111; observations = 2,129 n = 111; observations = 3,062

Within-person perceived stress was lagged from the prior EMA signal (t − 1). Gender was coded such that men were the reference category. Bolded effects are significant at p < .05, adjusted for gender, age, and BMI. Between = grand-mean-centered variable (reflecting individual differences); within = person-mean-centered variable (reflecting fluctuations relative to an individual’s own average level of a variable).

BMI body mass index; CI 95% confidence interval; EMA ecological momentary assessment; SE standard error.