Table 5.
Study | Domain Score | Overall Score | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preliminaries | Introduction | Design | Sampling | Data Collection | Ethical Matters | Results | Discussion | ||
Brown et al28 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 51% |
Rosenblat et al27 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 53% |
Health Quality Ontario 24 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 55% |
Fabbri et al25 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 60% |
Rosenblat et al26 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 83% |
Bousman et al23 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 88% |
Notes: Poor quality (0–50%), moderate quality (51–74%), high quality (75–100%).