Table 5. NRI results of CPLM and HPTM when compared to AMH and AFC.

Models	Cohort	AMH	AFC
		(95% CI)	(95% CI)
CPLM vs.	Train	13.4%**	18.8%**
		(9.3%-14.2%)	(5.5%-33.1%)
	Validation	18.4%**	21.1%**
		(5.3%-19.1%)	(29.3%-49.6%)
HPLM vs.	Train	74.7%**	82.6%**
		(66.4%-83.0%)	(75.4%-89.8%)
	Validation	27.50%	37.7%**
		(11.4%-43.6%)	(21.8%-53.7%)

*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.