Table 5.
Diagnosis efficiency of combined diagnostic approaches.
| Diagnosis specificity and sensitivity | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ARMS-qPCR with cytology | |||
| Bethesda V/VI or (with) BRAF mutation | Bethesda II to IV with WT BRAF | ||
| Malignant | 48 | 7 | sensitiviry with 95% CI: 0.873 (0.749-0.943) |
| Benign | 2 | 12 | specificity with 95% CI: 0.857 (0.562-0.975) |
| ARMS-qPCR and NGS with cytology | |||
| Bethesda V/VI or (with) pathogenic mutation | Bethesda II to IV without pathogenic mutation | ||
| Malignant | 52 | 3 | sensitiviry with 95% CI: 0.945 (0.839-0.986) |
| Benign | 3 | 11 | specificity with 95% CI: 0.785 (0.488-0.943 |
Sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis based on combination of cytology and ARMS-qPCR for BRAF V600E mutation detection (Bethesda V/VI with/or BRAF mutation are considered malignant) and combination of cytology, ARMS-qPCR and NGS (Bethesda V/VI and/or pathogenic mutation are considered malignant).