Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;37(9):2763–2774. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa141

Table 1.

Softwares Used in Our Benchmark, with the Type of Method (ML, parsimony, or both), the Nature of the Input Trees (random tree, ML tree, tree with bootstrap-support values, or MCMC sample of trees), Whether the Method Is STA and Whether the Method Accounts for HGT.

Software Method Type Input Trees STA HGT Ref.
RAxML-NG ML Random No No Kozlov et al. (2019)
Notung Parsimony Supported ML Yes No Chen et al. (2000)
Treerecs Parsimony + ML Supported ML Yes No Comte et al. (2020)
Phyldog ML ML Yes No Boussau et al. (2013)
EcceTERA Parsimony Supported ML or MCMC samples Yes Yes Scornavacca et al. (2015)
ALE ML MCMC samples Yes Yes Szöllősi, Rosikiewicz, et al. (2013)
GeneRax ML Random or ML Yes Yes This paper