Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Foot Ankle Surg (N Y). 2021 Mar 29;1(1):100005. doi: 10.1016/j.fastrc.2021.100005

A Limb is a Peninsula- and No Clinician is an Island: Introducing the American Limb Preservation Society (ALPS)

Ryan T Crews a, Brian D Lepow b, Joseph L Mills Sr b, Michael S Conte c, Bijan Najafi b, John S Steinberg d, Stephanie C Wu a, David G Armstrong e
PMCID: PMC8312703  NIHMSID: NIHMS1706843  PMID: 34318290

According to a well-known proverb: “if you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go together.” When caring for the at-risk lower limb, going it alone may lead to the express lane to an amputation. Unfortunately, once an amputation is performed the next stop on the express lane is often death; the 5-year mortality is 46.2% following a diabetes-associated minor amputation and 56.6% following a diabetes-associated major amputation1. In 2014 the Society for Vascular Surgery published the WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection) classification system for staging lower extremities at-risk for amputation2 and a subsequent meta-analysis of WIfI publications confirmed it to be predictive of one-year amputation risk3. The three risk-factors of WIfI inherently suggest the need for interprofessional collaborative efforts if at-risk limbs are to be preserved. In fact, before the publication of the WIfI classification system, several of its authors initiated concerted efforts to promote a podiatric and vascular surgery (‘Toe and Flow’) team approach to limb preservation4. This effort to extend the mileage traversed by at-risk limbs was a nascent recognition of the need to work collaboratively to save such limbs. The following searches, conducted on March 5th, 2021 in PubMed, and yielding only 56 and 54 publication hits, respectively (many duplicative), confirm the historical lack of a team approach to limb preservation.

Search 1: ((interprofessional relations[MeSH Terms]) AND (amputation[MeSH Terms])) NOT (trauma)

Search 2: (diabetic foot[MeSH Terms]) AND (interprofessional relations[MeSH Terms])

With the possible exception of 3 publications prior to 1975, all publications of relevance from those searches were published in the twenty-first century. Despite the emphasis on interprofessional practice features of interdependence and shared decision making5 being relatively new in limb preservation, outcomes from individual studies and meta-analyses have been strong and consistent in suggesting that these teams improve care and commensurately reduce risk for amputation68.

With the recent advent of the team approach to limb preservation, investigational and clinical efforts to promote an interprofessional approach to limb preservation are accelerating globally915. While podiatric and vascular surgery are indisputably key components to amputation prevention teams15, unnecessary amputations remain a substantial challenge and a correspondingly substantial team is required to meet this foe. Diabetes educators, endocrinologists, infectious disease specialists, interventional radiologists and cardiologists, nurses, pathologists, pedorthists, physical therapists, plastic surgeons, clinical scientists, and many others are valiantly working to save limbs. However, the individual efforts of each respective profession in the US and abroad have previously remained largely isolated in silos and lacked a dedicated interprofessional entity tasked with pooling resources and efforts. In 2020, such an organization, The American Limb Preservation Society (ALPS- https://limbpreservationsociety.org/), was founded to advance the science and clinical care of limb preservation and to develop the next generation of clinicians, scientists and clinician scientists in the field. Its ambitious collective goal is to eliminate preventable amputations over the next generation. In the short time since its inception, ALPS has made significant progress in bringing together varied organizations with a vested interest in limb preservation. These parties are now working together collaboratively for the benefit of those facing the potential tragedy of limb loss. Having adopted the well-established diabetic foot conference DFCon (https://www.dfcon.com/) as its official annual conference; ALPS has ensured from its inception that it will have not only a national, but a global platform for promoting its initiatives. With momentum rapidly building, ALPS remains committed to seeking the broadest possible coalition in the fight for the preservation of limbs and lives. Much like Uncle Sam ‘wanting you’ to sign up to protect the USA, ALPS ‘wants you’ to join in the preservation of limbs now and in the future.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number: 1R01DK124789–01A1. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Armstrong DG, Swerdlow MA, Armstrong AA, Conte MS, Padula WV, Bus SA. Five year mortality and direct costs of care for people with diabetic foot complications are comparable to cancer. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020;13(1):16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mills JL, Sr. Conte MS, Armstrong DG, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(1):220–234 e221–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Reijen NS, Ponchant K, Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJW. Editor’s Choice - The Prognostic Value of the WIfI Classification in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(3):362–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mills JL, Sr., Armstrong DG, Andros G. Rescuing sisyphus: the team approach to amputation prevention. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010;100(5):315–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chamberlain-Salaun J, Mills J, Usher K. Terminology used to describe health care teams: an integrative review of the literature. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013; 6:65–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Musuuza J, Sutherland BL, Kurter S, Balasubramanian P, Bartels CM, Brennan MB. A systematic review of multidisciplinary teams to reduce major amputations for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg. Published online October 29, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blanchette V, Brousseau-Foley M, Cloutier L. Effect of contact with podiatry in a team approach context on diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020;13(1):15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367–2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wrobel JS, Robbins JM, Charns MP, Bonacker KM, Reiber GE, Pogach L. Diabetes-related foot care at 10 Veterans Affairs medical centers: must do’s associated with successful microsystems. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources. 2006;32(4):206–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rubio JA, Aragon-Sanchez J, Jimenez S, et al. Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team for the diabetic foot. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2014;13(1):22–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang C, Mai L, Yang C, et al. Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team in patient with diabetes foot ulcer. BMC Endocr Disord. 2016;16(1):38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Riaz M, Miyan Z, Waris N, et al. Impact of multidisciplinary foot care team on outcome of diabetic foot ulcer in term of lower extremity amputation at a tertiary care unit in Karachi, Pakistan. Int Wound J. 2019;16(3):768–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jhaveri VV, Sullivan C, Ward A, et al. More Specialties, Less Problems: Using collaborative competency between Infectious Disease, Podiatry, and Pathology to improve the care of patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hendricks LE, Hendricks RT. The certified diabetes educator and the pedorthist working together. Diabetes Educ. 2001;27(6):812–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rogers LC, Andros G, Caporusso J, Harkless LB, Mills JL, Sr., Armstrong DG. Toe and flow: essential components and structure of the amputation prevention team. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3 Suppl):23S–27S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES