Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0254813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254813

Table 3. Descriptive statistics of errors incurred by best methods to calculate stance duration on each surface.

(%) Surface Method Mean SD LLoA ULoA Sensitivity (%) PPV (%)
FORELIMB
WALK Asphalt M1p 0.92 2.98 -2.06 3.90 100 99
Grass M1p 0.52 2.14 -1.61 2.66 98 99
Sand M1p 1.19 5.29 -4.10 6.49 100 97
TROT Asphalt M2p 1.09**,*** 8.68 -7.59 9.77 99 100
Grass M2p -0.57** 6.67 -7.24 6.10 100 100
Sand M2p -1.09*** 7.68 -8.77 6.58 99 100
HINDLIMB
WALK Asphalt M1p 0.10 3.42 -3.31 3.52 100 100
Grass M1p -0.33 7.42 -7.75 7.09 99 100
Sand M1p 0.22 3.60 -3.38 3.82 99 98
TROT Asphalt M1p 0.50 2.38 -1.87 2.88 99 99
Grass M1p 0.92 2.26 -1.34 3.18 97 100
Sand M1p 1.16 4.28 -3.12 5.44 98 100

Descriptive statistics of the errors (as % of stride duration) incurred by the best methods to calculate stance duration; superscripts **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 indicate where two mean errors differed significantly, as revealed by post hoc tests.