Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;14(4):1343–1352. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13709

Table 1.

Comparison of various culture schemes.

Strain NO. ST IR typing a
MH24h CB24h BA24h MCA24h MH48h CB48h BA48h MCA48h MH24h + BA24h MH24h + MH48h
E105 ST101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
S102 ST280 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
J807 ST11 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2
F824 ST23 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 b
L106 ST152 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3
D713 ST111 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4
D610 ST1786 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5
R125 ST1779 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 7 5
E502 ST11 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 9 8 6
Total 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 9 8 6
COV 0.295 0.275 0.196 0.439 0.249 0.423 0.3 0.268 0.521 0.56
a

ST, sequence type; COV, cut‐off value; MH, Mueller‐Hinton agar; CB, China Blue agar; BA, Columbia Sheep Blood agar; MCA, MaConkey agar.

b

The replicates of F824 could not be grouped into the same cluster.