Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;14(4):1343–1352. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13709

Table 2.

Comparison of each typing method.

Method No. of types Simpson’s ID (95% CI) Concordance with WGS Adjusted Rand index
MLST IR PFGE WGS
MLST 9 0.735 (0.507–0.963) 52.90%
IR 13 0.963 (0.919–1.000) 92.90% 0.192
PFGE 14 0.978 (0.951–1.000) 100% 0.118 0.743
WGS 14 0.978 (0.951–1.000) 0.118 0.743 1