Table 2.
Average results obtained by developed models on the deep features
| Deep features/deep learning model | Acc (%) | Sen (%) | Spe (%) | Pre (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG-16 | DNN | 91.84 ± 2.23 | 69.6 ± 13.05 | 97.4 ± 2.8 | 89.21 ± 9.51 |
| Bi-LSTM | 95.68 ± 1.93 | 88.0 ± 7.16 | 97.6 ± 2.33 | 91.02 ± 7.31 | |
| ResNet-50 | DNN | 92.64 ± 1.38 | 70.4 ± 8.24 | 98.2 ± 0.75 | 90.93 ± 3.02 |
| Bi-LSTM | 93.28 ± 1.09 | 76.0 ± 5.66 | 97.6 ± 1.85 | 89.58 ± 6.28 | |
| DenseNet-121 | DNN | 88.32 ± 0.64 | 50.4 ± 6.5 | 98.0 ± 2.1 | 88.89 ± 10.69 |
| Bi-LSTM | 89.76 ± 1.48 | 60.0 ± 8.0 | 97.4 ± 1.5 | 86.27 ± 8.02 | |
| Concatenated deep features | DNN | 95.84 ± 1.06 | 82.4 ± 7.42 | 99.2 ± 0.75 | 96.59 ± 3.14 |
| Bi-LSTM | 97.6 ± 0.88 | 91.2 ± 1.6 | 99.2 ± 1.17 | 96.86 ± 4.5 |
The best result is shown in bold font