Table 3.

GLMRM-ANOVA Summary Results for Differential Profile Analysis on the Basis of T Scores in the 5 Domains, 25 Facets, T/C, and PDs between CSA and Non-CSA Groups

Test	Profile	F	Sig.	η2
Parallelism	5 domains–groups	1.53a	0.20	0.02
	25 facets–groups	2.68b	<.001**	0.03
	T/C–groups	2.71c	0.02*	0.03
	PDs–groups	1.79d	0.08	0.02
Overall difference	5 domains	9.41	0.003**	0.10
	25 facets	7.27	0.008**	0.08
	T/C	1.32	0.25	0.02
	PDs	3.80	0.06	0.04

CSA: childhood sexual abuse, PDs: personality disorders, T/C: temperament and character. ^aThe alternative test was Huynh-Feldt with adjusted d.f. for not assumed sphericity (Mauchly’s W = 0.67; approx. chi-square = 32.62; P < 0.001). ^bThe alternative test was Huynh-Feldt with adjusted d.f. for not assumed sphericity (Mauchly’s W = 0.00; approx. chi-square = 824.76; P < 0.001). ^cThe alternative test was Huynh-Feldt with adjusted d.f. for not assumed sphericity (Mauchly’s W = 0.57; approx. chi-square = 824.76; P < 0.01). ^dThe alternative test was Huynh-Feldt with adjusted d.f. for not assumed sphericity (Mauchly’s W = 0.35; approx. chi-square = 85.84; P < 0.001). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.