Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 26;11:15150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94605-7

Table 1.

Corneal inflammatory cell count at TP.0 and on outcome in the following 6 months.

Cell count at TP.0
median (range)
Cell count at TP.0
median (range)
Cell count at TP.0
median (range)
Clinical stable at TP.0 (n = 74) 14 (0–349) INCAT-ODSS stable at TP.0 (n = 119) 18 (0–365) No therapy escalation at TP.0 (n = 97) 20 (1–365)
Clinical active at TP.0 (n = 61) 54 (0–365) INCAT-ODSS instable at TP.0 (n = 22) 54 (1–135) Therapy escalation at TP.0 (n = 40) 28 (0–194)
p-value 0.0009 p-value 0.018 p-value n.s.
Clinical stable at TP.3 (n = 80) 16 (1–365) INCAT-ODSS stable at TP.3 (n = 93) 19 (0–365) No therapy escalation at TP.3 (n = 78) 16 (0–365)
Clinical active at TP.3(n = 20) 54 (0–181) INCAT-ODSS instable at TP.3 (n = 9) 64 (16–158) Therapy escalation at TP.3 (n = 22) 31 (3–181)
p-value 0.016 p-value 0.016 p-value n.s.
Clinical stable at TP.6 (n = 79) 19 (3–349) INCAT-ODSS stable at TP.6 (n = 79) 20 (3–349) No therapy escalation at TP.6 (n = 80) 23 (3–349)
Clinical active at TP.6 (n = 14) 32 (0–163) INCAT-ODSS instable at TP.6 (n = 14) 32 (0–194) Therapy escalation at TP.6 (n = 12) 32 (3–158)
p-value n.s. p-value n.s. p-value n.s.

p-values were corrected by the Holm–Bonferroni method, groups were formed according to the outcome parameter.

The different n-values at TP.0, TP.3 and TP.6 are a result of “loss to follow-up”.